Click on Denise's profile to read the digital Angeleno issue.
Have you seen the June issue of Angeleno Magazine? Denise was selected as a "2017 Angeleno Power Player". Enjoy the digital version of the issue by clicking on Denise's profile.
The Guzman Law Group is proud to represent the Estate of Jonathan Larson, the Tony and Pulitzer Prize, Award-winning author of "RENT." The firm and the Larson's agent, Jonathan Mills of Paradigm, have negotiated a deal with the FOX NETWORK for the live presentation of the play that will be produced by award-winning Marc Platt Productions and Julie Larson. Read the recent announcement to the entertainment industry by The Hollywood Reporter.
Denise M. Guzman and The Guzman Law Group BEST Attorneys in the South Bay
Thank you to all our clients, colleagues, and friends for voting us the Best Attorneys in the South Bay! We are honored to be recognized as the South Bay's most trusted team of legal advisors!
Guzman Law Group Featured in Southbay Magazine's Finance and Wealth Management Profile.
click image to enlarge
The recent battle between Donald and Shelly Sterling over control of the Los Angeles Clippers basketball team provided a valuable lesson for clients who have created trusts, or are considering creating trusts. Not only is it critical for those who create trusts to understand the dispositive provisions of their trusts, but they also need to understand the so-called “boilerplate” provisions included in their trusts.
“Boilerplate” typically refers to the standard provisions that are included in legal documents such as contracts, trusts, powers of attorney, and wills. In trusts, the boilerplate language usually refers to procedural and more general provisions concerning various aspects of the trust and how it is to be administered. However, in the Sterling situation, the case turned on the meaning and use of certain “boilerplate” language.
The critical “boilerplate” language in Sterling dealt with the way in which a trustee would be deemed unable to continue to act as trustee of the trust. The court determined that the trust language was clear and its procedures properly followed by Shelly Sterling. As a result, Donald was deemed incapable of continuing to act as trustee. This allowed Shelly to proceed and sell the Clippers for $2 billion to Steve Ballmer, which was in the trust’s best interest, and which avoided the NBA seizing control of the team.
One valuable lesson learned by the Sterling case is that those who create trusts need to understand the “boilerplate” language in their trusts, including provisions like the ones at issue in the Sterling case. These provisions are designed to address situations that may arise in the future, and chances are that some of them will not be applicable to a given person’s situation. However, there is no way to predict which provisions will become at issue in the future, which is why it is critical for those who create trusts to understand these provisions and ensure that they accurately reflect their intent.
In daily life today, most of us put our electronic “John Hancock” on the screen every day, whether at the grocery store, drug store or other businesses. We’re used to it as a perfectly valid way to seal- the-deal for routine retail transactions.
But what about other forms of documents, such as business contracts or wills and trust? Are electronic (no ink, no paper) signatures valid?
The answer is MAYBE.
For more than ten years, the US has been a signator to The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGNA) which makes e-signatures just as valid as the ‘wet signatures’ on paper. “E-signatures” come in many forms, such as: (1) typing a signature into a space as directed on a form; (2) copying and pasting a scanned versions of the signer’s name; (3) using one of the cryptographic technologies available that scrambles information of the sender and allows the receiver to unscramble; or (4) clicking that ubiquitous, “I ACCEPT” button before software is enabled.
So, the ESIGNA allows business to proceed efficiently with the foregoing methods of “e-signatures.”
But some documents still MUST be signed the old-fashioned way in order to be valid. What is “old fashioned?” Using a pen and signing your name on piece of paper. These types of documents include:
- WILLS, CODICILS AND TRUSTS
- DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ADOPTION AND DIVORCE
- COURT ORDERS, NOTICES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS LIKE PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS
- NOTICES/DOCUMENTS RELATING TO
- DEFAULT, FORECLOSURE, EVICTION, REPOSESSION
- CANCELLATION OF HEALTH OR LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS
- HEALTH & SAFETY PRODUCT RECALLS
- TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
You’ll notice that the above list has a common thread – all the types of documents mentioned pertain to personal, health and safety issues. And even if you do have that original document, whether you need to provide a copy of that original “wet signature” document for a transaction here or abroad (from filing a deed with the county record or applying for a foreign tax subsidy) will depend on a number of factors, including the intent of the parties.
In today’s marketplace for routine business transactions between private parties, contracts often have a clause that provides: A facsimile copy and signature or electronic signature shall be deemed an original for all purposes herein.
People routinely sign contracts, scan them into their computer and send those scanned signature pages around the globe for counter- signature with the parties honoring the scanned documents as originals. Keep in mind, however, that you should consult with your lawyer to make sure that your particular document has been properly executed and maybe even notarized or given an “Apostile” status as required for some purposes internationally.